<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:extra="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
    xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
    <channel rdf:about="http://globalizationandhealth.com/feeds/mostaccessed/journal?quantity=&amp;format=rss&amp;version=">
        <title>Globalization and Health - Most accessed articles</title>
        <link>http://www.globalizationandhealth.com</link>
        <description>The most accessed research articles published by Globalization and Health</description>
        <dc:date>2010-03-02T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/1/1/14" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/2/1/4" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/6/1/1" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/3/1/5" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/2/1/9" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/1/1/13" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/6/1/3" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/3/1/6" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/3/1/7" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/6/1/2" />
                            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
        <extra:info rdf:parseType="Literal">
            <html:div style="font:14px Verdana, Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                <html:span style="font-weight:bold">
                    This is an RSS newsfeed from BioMed Central
                </html:span>
                <html:br />
                <html:span style="font-size: 12px;">
                    It is intended to be used with an RSS reader. For more information about RSS newsfeeds from BioMed Central, visit
                    <html:br />
                    <html:a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/" style="color:#3333CC; font-size:12px;">
                        http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/
                    </html:a>
                    <html:br />
                </html:span>
            </html:div>
        </extra:info>
        <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </channel>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/1/1/14">
        <title>The health impacts of globalisation: a conceptual framework</title>
        <description>This paper describes a conceptual framework for the health implications of globalisation. The framework is developed by first identifying the main determinants of population health and the main features of the globalisation process. The resulting conceptual model explicitly visualises that globalisation affects the institutional, economic, social-cultural and ecological determinants of population health, and that the globalisation process mainly operates at the contextual level, while influencing health through its more distal and proximal determinants. The developed framework provides valuable insights in how to organise the complexity involved in studying the health effects resulting from globalisation. It could, therefore, give a meaningful contribution to further empirical research by serving as a &apos;think-model&apos; and provides a basis for the development of future scenarios on health.</description>
        <link>http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/1/1/14</link>
                <dc:creator>Maud Huynen</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Pim Martens</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Henk Hilderink</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Globalization and Health 2005, 1:14</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2005-08-03T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1744-8603-1-14</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Globalization and Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1744-8603</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>14</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2005-08-03T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/2/1/4">
        <title>Uneven dietary development: linking the policies and processes of globalization with the nutrition transition, obesity and diet-related chronic diseases</title>
        <description>In a &quot;nutrition transition&quot;, the consumption of foods high in fats and sweeteners is increasing throughout the developing world. The transition, implicated in the rapid rise of obesity and diet-related chronic diseases worldwide, is rooted in the processes of globalization. Globalization affects the nature of agri-food systems, thereby altering the quantity, type, cost and desirability of foods available for consumption. Understanding the links between globalization and the nutrition transition is therefore necessary to help policy makers develop policies, including food policies, for addressing the global burden of chronic disease. While the subject has been much discussed, tracing the specific pathways between globalization and dietary change remains a challenge.To help address this challenge, this paper explores how one of the central mechanisms of globalization, the integration of the global marketplace, is affecting the specific diet patterns. Focusing on middle-income countries, it highlights the importance of three major processes of market integration: (I) production and trade of agricultural goods; (II) foreign direct investment in food processing and retailing; and (III) global food advertising and promotion.The paper reveals how specific policies implemented to advance the globalization agenda account in part for some recent trends in the global diet. Agricultural production and trade policies have enabled more vegetable oil consumption; policies on foreign direct investment have facilitated higher consumption of highly-processed foods, as has global food marketing. These dietary outcomes also reflect the socioeconomic and cultural context in which these policies are operating.An important finding is that the dynamic, competitive forces unleashed as a result of global market integration facilitates not only convergence in consumption habits (as is commonly assumed in the &quot;Coca-Colonization&quot; hypothesis), but adaptation to products targeted at different niche markets. This convergence-divergence duality raises the policy concern that globalization will exacerbate uneven dietary development between rich and poor. As high-income groups in developing countries accrue the benefits of a more dynamic marketplace, lower-income groups may well experience convergence towards poor quality obseogenic diets, as observed in western countries.Global economic polices concerning agriculture, trade, investment and marketing affect what the world eats. They are therefore also global food and health policies. Health policy makers should pay greater attention to these policies in order to address some of the structural causes of obesity and diet-related chronic diseases worldwide, especially among the groups of low socioeconomic status.</description>
        <link>http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/2/1/4</link>
                <dc:creator>Corinna Hawkes</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Globalization and Health 2006, 2:4</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2006-03-28T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1744-8603-2-4</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Globalization and Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1744-8603</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>4</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2006-03-28T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/6/1/1">
        <title>Sex work and the 2010 FIFA World Cup: time for public health imperatives to prevail</title>
        <description>Background:
Sex work is receiving increased attention in southern Africa. In the context of South Africa&apos;s intense preparation for hosting the 2010 FIFA World Cup, anxiety over HIV transmission in the context of sex work has sparked debate on the most appropriate legal response to this industry.DiscussionDrawing on existing literature, the authors highlight the increased vulnerability of sex workers in the context of the HIV pandemic in southern Africa. They argue that laws that criminalise sex work not only compound sex workers&apos; individual risk for HIV, but also compromise broader public health goals. International sporting events are thought to increase demand for paid sex and, particularly in countries with hyper-endemic HIV such as South Africa, likely to foster increased HIV transmission through unprotected sex.SummaryThe 2010 FIFA World Cup presents a strategic opportunity for South Africa to respond to the challenges that the sex industry poses in a strategic and rights-based manner. Public health goals and growing evidence on HIV prevention suggest that sex work is best approached in a context where it is decriminalised and where sex workers are empowered. In short, the authors argue for a moratorium on the enforcement of laws that persecute and victimise sex workers during the World Cup period.</description>
        <link>http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/6/1/1</link>
                <dc:creator>Marlise Richter</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Matthew Chersich</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Fiona Scorgie</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Stanley Luchters</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Marleen Temmerman</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Richard Steen</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Globalization and Health 2010, 6:1</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-02-11T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1744-8603-6-1</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Globalization and Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1744-8603</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>6</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>1</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-02-11T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/3/1/5">
        <title>Globalization and social determinants of health: Introduction and methodological background (part 1 of 3)

</title>
        <description>Globalization is a key context for the study of social determinants of health (SDH). Broadly stated, SDH are the conditions in which people live and work, and that affect their opportunities to lead healthy lives.In this first article of a three-part series, we describe the origins of the series in work conducted for the Globalization Knowledge Network of the World Health Organization&apos;s Commission on Social Determinants of Health and in the Commission&apos;s specific concern with health equity. We explain our rationale for defining globalization with reference to the emergence of a global marketplace, and the economic and political choices that have facilitated that emergence. We identify a number of conceptual milestones in studying the relation between globalization and SDH over the period 1987&#8211;2005, and then show that because globalization comprises multiple, interacting policy dynamics, reliance on evidence from multiple disciplines (transdisciplinarity) and research methodologies is required. So, too, is explicit recognition of the uncertainties associated with linking globalization &#8211; the quintessential &quot;upstream&quot; variable &#8211; with changes in SDH and in health outcomes.</description>
        <link>http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/3/1/5</link>
                <dc:creator>Ronald Labonte</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ted Schrecker</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Globalization and Health 2007, 3:5</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2007-06-19T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1744-8603-3-5</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Globalization and Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1744-8603</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>5</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2007-06-19T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/2/1/9">
        <title>Can the ubiquitous power of mobile phones be used to improve health outcomes in developing countries?</title>
        <description>Background:
The ongoing policy debate about the value of communications technology in promoting development objectives is diverse. Some view computer/web/phone communications technology as insufficient to solve development problems while others view communications technology as assisting all sections of the population. This paper looks at evidence to support or refute the idea that fixed and mobile telephones is, or could be, an effective healthcare intervention in developing countries.
Methods:
A Web-based and library database search was undertaken including the following databases: MEDLINE, CINAHL, (nursing &amp; allied health), Evidence Based Medicine (EBM), POPLINE, BIOSIS, and Web of Science, AIDSearch (MEDLINE AIDS/HIV Subset, AIDSTRIALS &amp; AIDSDRUGS) databases.
Results:
Evidence can be found to both support and refute the proposition that fixed and mobile telephones is, or could be, an effective healthcare intervention in developing countries. It is difficult to generalize because of the different outcome measurements and the small number of controlled studies. There is almost no literature on using mobile telephones as a healthcare intervention for HIV, TB, malaria, and chronic conditions in developing countries. Clinical outcomes are rarely measured. Convincing evidence regarding the overall cost-effectiveness of mobile phone &quot; telemedicine&quot; is still limited and good-quality studies are rare. Evidence of the cost effectiveness of such interventions to improve adherence to medicines is also quite weak.
Conclusion:
The developed world model of personal ownership of a phone may not be appropriate to the developing world in which shared mobile telephone use is important. Sharing may be a serious drawback to use of mobile telephones as a healthcare intervention in terms of stigma and privacy, but its magnitude is unknown. One advantage, however, of telephones with respect to adherence to medicine in chronic care models is its ability to create a multi-way interaction between patient and provider(s) and thus facilitate the dynamic nature of this relationship. Regulatory reforms required for proper operation of basic and value-added telecommunications services are a priority if mobile telecommunications are to be used for healthcare initiatives.</description>
        <link>http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/2/1/9</link>
                <dc:creator>Warren Kaplan</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Globalization and Health 2006, 2:9</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2006-05-23T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1744-8603-2-9</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Globalization and Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1744-8603</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>9</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2006-05-23T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/1/1/13">
        <title>HIV/AIDS: global trends, global funds and delivery bottlenecks</title>
        <description>Globalisation affects all facets of human life, including health and well being. The HIV/AIDS epidemic has highlighted the global nature of human health and welfare and globalisation has given rise to a trend toward finding common solutions to global health challenges. Numerous international funds have been set up in recent times to address global health challenges such as HIV.However, despite increasingly large amounts of funding for health initiatives being made available to poorer regions of the world, HIV infection rates and prevalence continue to increase world wide. As a result, the AIDS epidemic is expanding and intensifying globally. Worst affected are undoubtedly the poorer regions of the world as combinations of poverty, disease, famine, political and economic instability and weak health infrastructure exacerbate the severe and far-reaching impacts of the epidemic.One of the major reasons for the apparent ineffectiveness of global interventions is historical weaknesses in the health systems of underdeveloped countries, which contribute to bottlenecks in the distribution and utilisation of funds. Strengthening these health systems, although a vital component in addressing the global epidemic, must however be accompanied by mitigation of other determinants as well. These are intrinsically complex and include social and environmental factors, sexual behaviour, issues of human rights and biological factors, all of which contribute to HIV transmission, progression and mortality. An equally important factor is ensuring an equitable balance between prevention and treatment programmes in order to holistically address the challenges presented by the epidemic.</description>
        <link>http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/1/1/13</link>
                <dc:creator>Hoosen Coovadia</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jacqui Hadingham</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Globalization and Health 2005, 1:13</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2005-08-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1744-8603-1-13</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Globalization and Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1744-8603</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>13</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2005-08-01T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/6/1/3">
        <title>National and subnational HIV/AIDS coordination: are global health initiatives closing the gap between intent and practice? </title>
        <description>Background:
A coordinated response to HIV/AIDS remains one of the &apos;grand challenges&apos; facing policymakers today. Global health initiatives (GHIs) have the potential both to facilitate and exacerbate coordination at the national and subnational level. Evidence of the effects of GHIs on coordination is beginning to emerge but has hitherto been limited to single-country studies and broad-brush reviews. To date, no study has provided a focused synthesis of the effects of GHIs on national and subnational health systems across multiple countries. To address this deficit, we review primary data from seven country studies on the effects of three GHIs on coordination of HIV/AIDS programmes: the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, the President&apos;s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), and the World Bank&apos;s HIV/AIDS programmes including the Multi-country AIDS Programme (MAP).
Methods:
In-depth interviews were conducted at national and subnational levels (179 and 218 respectively) in seven countries in Europe, Asia, Africa and South America, between 2006 and 2008. Studies explored the development and functioning of national and subnational HIV coordination structures, and the extent to which coordination efforts around HIV/AIDS are aligned with and strengthen country health systems.
Results:
Positive effects of GHIs included the creation of opportunities for multisectoral participation, greater political commitment and increased transparency among most partners. However, the quality of participation was often limited, and some GHIs bypassed coordination mechanisms, especially at the subnational level, weakening their effectiveness.
Conclusions:
The paper identifies residual national and subnational obstacles to effective coordination and optimal use of funds by focal GHIs, which these GHIs, other donors and country partners need to collectively address.</description>
        <link>http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/6/1/3</link>
                <dc:creator>Neil Spicer</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Julia Aleshkina</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Regien Biesma</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ruairi Brugha</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Carlos Caceres</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Baltazar Chilundo</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ketevan Chkhatarashvili</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Andrew Harmer</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Pierre Miege</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Gulgun Murzalieva</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Phillimon Ndubani</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Natia Rukhadze</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Tetyana Semigina</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Aisling Walsh</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Gill Walt</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Xiulan Zhang</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Globalization and Health 2010, 6:3</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-03-02T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1744-8603-6-3</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Globalization and Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1744-8603</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>6</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>3</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-03-02T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/3/1/6">
        <title>Globalization and social determinants of health:
The role of the global marketplace (part 2 of 3)
</title>
        <description>Globalization is a key context for the study of social determinants of health (SDH): broadly stated, SDH are the conditions in which people live and work, and that affect their opportunities to lead healthy lives.In the first article in this three part series, we described the origins of the series in work conducted for the Globalization Knowledge Network of the World Health Organization&apos;s Commission on Social Determinants of Health and in the Commission&apos;s specific concern with health equity. We identified and defended a definition of globalization that gives primacy to the drivers and effects of transnational economic integration, and addressed a number of important conceptual and methodological issues in studying globalization&apos;s effects on SDH and their distribution, emphasizing the need for transdisciplinary approaches that reflect the complexity of the topic.In this second article, we identify and describe several, often interacting clusters of pathways leading from globalization to changes in SDH that are relevant to health equity. These involve: trade liberalization; the global reorganization of production and labour markets; debt crises and economic restructuring; financial liberalization; urban settings; influences that operate by way of the physical environment; and health systems changed by the global marketplace.</description>
        <link>http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/3/1/6</link>
                <dc:creator>Ronald Labonte</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ted Schrecker</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Globalization and Health 2007, 3:6</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2007-06-19T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1744-8603-3-6</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Globalization and Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1744-8603</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>6</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2007-06-19T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/3/1/7">
        <title>Globalization and social determinants of health: 
Promoting health equity in global governance (part 3 of 3)
</title>
        <description>This article is the third in a three-part review of research on globalization and the social determinants of health (SDH). In the first article of the series, we identified and defended an economically oriented definition of globalization and addressed a number of important conceptual and metholodogical issues. In the second article, we identified and described seven key clusters of pathways relevant to globalization&apos;s influence on SDH. This discussion provided the basis for the premise from which we begin this article: interventions to reduce health inequities by way of SDH are inextricably linked with social protection, economic management and development strategy.Reflecting this insight, and against the background of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), we focus on the asymmetrical distribution of gains, losses and power that is characteristic of globalization in its current form and identify a number of areas for innovation on the part of the international community: making more resources available for health systems, as part of the more general task of expanding and improving development assistance; expanding debt relief and taking poverty reduction more seriously; reforming the international trade regime; considering the implications of health as a human right; and protecting the policy space available to national governments to address social determinants of health, notably with respect to the hypermobility of financial capital. We conclude by suggesting that responses to globalization&apos;s effects on social determinants of health can be classified with reference to two contrasting visions of the future, reflecting quite distinct values.</description>
        <link>http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/3/1/7</link>
                <dc:creator>Ronald Labonte</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ted Schrecker</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Globalization and Health 2007, 3:7</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2007-06-19T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1744-8603-3-7</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Globalization and Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1744-8603</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>7</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2007-06-19T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/6/1/2">
        <title>Psychosocial impact of sickle cell disorder:
perspectives from a Nigerian setting
</title>
        <description>Sickle Cell Disorder is a global health problem with psychosocial implications. Nigeria has the largest population of people with sickle cell disorder, with about 150,000 births annually. This study explored the psychosocial impact of sickle cell disorder in 408 adolescents and adults attending three hospitals in Lagos, Nigeria. A questionnaire was designed for the study, with some of commonly described areas of psychosocial impact including general public perceptions and attitudes, education, employment, and healthcare issues, and emotional responses.The majority of participants thought that society in general had a negative image of SCD, and reported negative perceptions and attitudes. Some issues in education, employment, and healthcare were expressed, however these were in the minority of cases. The results also showed that depressive feelings were experienced in almost half the study population, even though feelings of anxiety or self-hate were uncommon. Clinical implications of these findings are considered.</description>
        <link>http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/6/1/2</link>
                <dc:creator>Kofi Anie</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Feyijimi Egunjobi</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Olu Akinyanju</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Globalization and Health 2010, 6:2</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-02-20T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1744-8603-6-2</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Globalization and Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1744-8603</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>6</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>2</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-02-20T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks" />
    </cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>
